<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Scalable DNS scheme for Amazon&#8217;s EC2 Cloud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vim-fu.com/better-dns-scheme-for-amazons-ec2-cloud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vim-fu.com/better-dns-scheme-for-amazons-ec2-cloud/</link>
	<description>A SysAdmin&#039;s Notebook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 07:07:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harish</title>
		<link>http://www.vim-fu.com/better-dns-scheme-for-amazons-ec2-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-1376</link>
		<dc:creator>Harish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 21:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vim-fu.com/?p=694#comment-1376</guid>
		<description>How do you maintain the nameserver IP&#039;s in the resolv.conf&#039;s on servers using your internal DNS?  It seems like the options are:

-Use the elastic IP address (con: security group rules get thrown out the window)
-Use the internal IP address (con: changes if the DNS server ever reboots)

Any advice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you maintain the nameserver IP&#8217;s in the resolv.conf&#8217;s on servers using your internal DNS?  It seems like the options are:</p>
<p>-Use the elastic IP address (con: security group rules get thrown out the window)<br />
-Use the internal IP address (con: changes if the DNS server ever reboots)</p>
<p>Any advice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jroberts</title>
		<link>http://www.vim-fu.com/better-dns-scheme-for-amazons-ec2-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-1329</link>
		<dc:creator>jroberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 01:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vim-fu.com/?p=694#comment-1329</guid>
		<description>I have not personally used Route 53, so I am not sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not personally used Route 53, so I am not sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jroberts</title>
		<link>http://www.vim-fu.com/better-dns-scheme-for-amazons-ec2-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-1328</link>
		<dc:creator>jroberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 01:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vim-fu.com/?p=694#comment-1328</guid>
		<description>Correct.

&quot;Where a.a.a.a and b.b.b.b are name servers in the us-east-1 region and c.c.c.c and d.d.d.d are in the eu-west-1 region.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct.</p>
<p>&#8220;Where a.a.a.a and b.b.b.b are name servers in the us-east-1 region and c.c.c.c and d.d.d.d are in the eu-west-1 region.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron West</title>
		<link>http://www.vim-fu.com/better-dns-scheme-for-amazons-ec2-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-1326</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vim-fu.com/?p=694#comment-1326</guid>
		<description>In the above post you have:

searchdomain ez.domain.int
nameserver c.c.c.c

The nameserver value &quot;c.c.c.c&quot; is that the internal IP for the EC2 instance running BIND?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the above post you have:</p>
<p>searchdomain ez.domain.int<br />
nameserver c.c.c.c</p>
<p>The nameserver value &#8220;c.c.c.c&#8221; is that the internal IP for the EC2 instance running BIND?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bennun</title>
		<link>http://www.vim-fu.com/better-dns-scheme-for-amazons-ec2-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-1316</link>
		<dc:creator>Bennun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 21:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vim-fu.com/?p=694#comment-1316</guid>
		<description>Superb article. Very instructive. What would you suggest for Amazon&#039;s Route 53 DNS system?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Superb article. Very instructive. What would you suggest for Amazon&#8217;s Route 53 DNS system?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noriko Withfield</title>
		<link>http://www.vim-fu.com/better-dns-scheme-for-amazons-ec2-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-708</link>
		<dc:creator>Noriko Withfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vim-fu.com/?p=694#comment-708</guid>
		<description>&lt;STRONG&gt;Good Site on Cloud Computing and SaaS&lt;/STRONG&gt; - We are periodically looking for good blog articles 
related to Rackspace Cloud. Also we are looking for contributors to add value to our blog.

Keep up the good work! 

&lt;STRONG&gt;Thanks&lt;/STRONG&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Good Site on Cloud Computing and SaaS</strong> &#8211; We are periodically looking for good blog articles<br />
related to Rackspace Cloud. Also we are looking for contributors to add value to our blog.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work! </p>
<p><strong>Thanks</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alternatives to Elastic IPs for EC2 Name Resolution</title>
		<link>http://www.vim-fu.com/better-dns-scheme-for-amazons-ec2-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-699</link>
		<dc:creator>Alternatives to Elastic IPs for EC2 Name Resolution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 21:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vim-fu.com/?p=694#comment-699</guid>
		<description>[...] Similarly, the two &#8220;run your own DNS&#8221; methods (Your Own DNS for your Domain, Your Own Dynamic DNS for your Domain) can be used to resolve to either the public IP address or the private IP address, but not both for the same client. You should set up your clients inside EC2 to utilize the DNS service inside EC2, and the domain should be configured to point to the DNS service running outside EC2 so that clients outside EC2 will see the public IPs. Note that clients running inside EC2 whose DNS resolution you do not control (for example, another EC2 user&#8217;s client) will be referred to the public IPs. Jeff Roberts offers some great practical suggestions for running your own DNS inside EC2. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Similarly, the two &#8220;run your own DNS&#8221; methods (Your Own DNS for your Domain, Your Own Dynamic DNS for your Domain) can be used to resolve to either the public IP address or the private IP address, but not both for the same client. You should set up your clients inside EC2 to utilize the DNS service inside EC2, and the domain should be configured to point to the DNS service running outside EC2 so that clients outside EC2 will see the public IPs. Note that clients running inside EC2 whose DNS resolution you do not control (for example, another EC2 user&#8217;s client) will be referred to the public IPs. Jeff Roberts offers some great practical suggestions for running your own DNS inside EC2. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Roberts on a scalable DNS scheme for EC2 &#171; JZ Talk Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.vim-fu.com/better-dns-scheme-for-amazons-ec2-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-695</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Roberts on a scalable DNS scheme for EC2 &#171; JZ Talk Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 07:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vim-fu.com/?p=694#comment-695</guid>
		<description>[...] DNS scheme for EC2 My ex-colleague from OpenX, Jeff Roberts, has another great blog post on &#8216;A Scalable DNS Scheme for Amazon&#8217;s EC2 Cloud&#8216;. If you need to deploy an internal DNS infrastructure in EC2, you have to read this post. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] DNS scheme for EC2 My ex-colleague from OpenX, Jeff Roberts, has another great blog post on &#8216;A Scalable DNS Scheme for Amazon&#8217;s EC2 Cloud&#8216;. If you need to deploy an internal DNS infrastructure in EC2, you have to read this post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Scalable DNS scheme for Amazon’s EC2 Cloud &#8250; ec2base</title>
		<link>http://www.vim-fu.com/better-dns-scheme-for-amazons-ec2-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator>A Scalable DNS scheme for Amazon’s EC2 Cloud &#8250; ec2base</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vim-fu.com/?p=694#comment-332</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.vim-fu.com/better-dns-scheme-for-amazons-ec2-cloud/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.vim-fu.com/better-dns-scheme-for-amazons-ec2-cloud/" rel="nofollow">http://www.vim-fu.com/better-dns-scheme-for-amazons-ec2-cloud/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

